David Brooks is doing the public no favors in his column today in which he suggests, among other things, that analysis of big data is devoid of human interpretation, bias, or judgment. (I am looking forward to reading "Big Data" by Viktor-Mayer Schonberger and Kenneth Cukier.) Leaving aside the headline, which Brooks may not have written, the commenters take the argument apart pretty well. I would just add one more thing: Mr. Brooks gave Jim Manzi's "Uncontrolled" a pretty big push last year. Has he forgotten what he said then? Big data is big data.
You can read my review of "Uncontrolled" here. And if you haven't read it yet, you should.
Showing posts with label David Brooks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Brooks. Show all posts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Here's a link to a series of charts The Atlantic.com has put together titled "10 Ways to Visualize How Americans Spend Money on He...
-
It's still in beta, and not all the data are loaded yet, but even so the website Mapping Gothic France , put together by art historians ...
-
I've mentioned Edward Tufte, the statistician and political scientist before. Now I've read Tufte's 2003 essay "The Cog...
-
"Rethinking a Lot: The Culture and Design of Parking," Eran Ben-Joseph's unexpectedly lyrical ode to the humble parking lot, d...
-
Like many other people, I am constantly on the lookout for useful organizing tools. Here are a couple to ponder, and play with, over the T...