The bar chart comes from an interactive graphic from a New England Journal of Medicine article discussing the differences in disease between 1810, when the Journal published its first issue, and 2010. (Nephropathy, according to the Free Dictionary, is any disease of the kidney.) I found the discussion in the NEJM article about the social definitions of disease equally interesting.
And measurement, as always, is complex. The authors say:Disease is always generated, experienced, defined, and ameliorated within a social world. Patients need notions of disease that explicate their suffering. Doctors need theories of etiology and pathophysiology that account for the burden of disease and inform therapeutic practice. Policymakers need realistic understandings of determinants of disease and medicine's impact in order to design systems that foster health. The history of disease offers crucial insights into the intersections of these interests and the ways they can inform medical practice and health policy.
Disease is always generated, experienced, defined, and ameliorated within a social world. Patients need notions of disease that explicate their suffering. Doctors need theories of etiology and pathophysiology that account for the burden of disease and inform therapeutic practice. Policymakers need realistic understandings of determinants of disease and medicine's impact in order to design systems that foster health. The history of disease offers crucial insights into the intersections of these interests and the ways they can inform medical practice and health policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment