David Brooks is doing the public no favors in his column today in which he suggests, among other things, that analysis of big data is devoid of human interpretation, bias, or judgment. (I am looking forward to reading "Big Data" by Viktor-Mayer Schonberger and Kenneth Cukier.) Leaving aside the headline, which Brooks may not have written, the commenters take the argument apart pretty well. I would just add one more thing: Mr. Brooks gave Jim Manzi's "Uncontrolled" a pretty big push last year. Has he forgotten what he said then? Big data is big data.
You can read my review of "Uncontrolled" here. And if you haven't read it yet, you should.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(102)
-
▼
April
(14)
- Global Warming Measurements, now on Twitter
- Hiatus week of April 22
- March weather, 2012 and 2013
- Social media and disasters
- David Brooks is not thinking straight about big data
- Critical reading, of charts
- "Data can be a source of creativity and art"
- That's a map of state-by-state obesity trends i...
- Art Networks
- Social Impact Bonds in New York and elsewhere
- Climate news roundup from Climate Central
- A good illustration of the importance of early chi...
- Cool pavements - a little hope for climate change?
- How representative is Facebook?
-
▼
April
(14)
Popular Posts
-
Here's a link to a series of charts The Atlantic.com has put together titled "10 Ways to Visualize How Americans Spend Money on He...
-
It's still in beta, and not all the data are loaded yet, but even so the website Mapping Gothic France , put together by art historians ...
-
I've mentioned Edward Tufte, the statistician and political scientist before. Now I've read Tufte's 2003 essay "The Cog...
-
Like many other people, I am constantly on the lookout for useful organizing tools. Here are a couple to ponder, and play with, over the T...
-
"Rethinking a Lot: The Culture and Design of Parking," Eran Ben-Joseph's unexpectedly lyrical ode to the humble parking lot, d...
No comments:
Post a Comment